RE: OSCAR (Linux vs Win64) graph discrepancies
Moderator's Note:
I have moved the OSCAR data display problem posts from Aldebaran's therapy support thread into this thread.
RE: OSCAR (Linux vs Win64) graph discrepancies
So the output of "apt policy libqt5core5a" :
===================================
Installed: 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu2.1
Candidate: 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu2.1
Version table:
*** 5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu2.1 500
500
http://ftp.usf.edu/pub/ubuntu focal-updates/universe amd64 Packages
500
http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/universe amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
5.12.8+dfsg-0ubuntu1 500
500
http://ftp.usf.edu/pub/ubuntu focal/universe amd64 Packages
=================================
Your hunch was right. I used the external USB multi-card reader to import data into my Linux laptop looks good now! All other nights are good as well. No weird looking blanks anymore. I should have seen it, because each import yielded a different looking graph.
After (using external USB card reader)
Before (using built-in card reader on laptop)
RE: OSCAR (Linux vs Win64) graph discrepancies
Thank you for checking both those items; It is quite a relief to me to confirm a hardware problem that is so easily fixed.
Apnea Board Monitors are members who help oversee the smooth functioning of the Board. They are also members of the Advisory Committee which helps shape Apnea Board's rules & policies. Membership in the Advisory Members group does not imply medical expertise or qualification for advising Sleep Apnea patients concerning their treatment.
RE: OSCAR (Linux vs Win64) graph discrepancies
Look at the good side of the bad reader. If you can't improve your therapy, keep reloading it until it looks good.
RE: OSCAR (Linux vs Win64) graph discrepancies
LOL... >Crimson Nape
Not a problem, this could be another entry in your troubleshooting handbook! > pholynyk