OSCAR Statistics Page - Printable Version +- Apnea Board Forum - CPAP | Sleep Apnea (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums) +-- Forum: Public Area (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums/Forum-Public-Area) +--- Forum: Software Support Forum (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums/Forum-Software-Support-Forum) +--- Thread: OSCAR Statistics Page (/Thread-OSCAR-Statistics-Page) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: OSCAR Statistics Page - GuyScharf - 09-07-2020 (09-07-2020, 06:09 PM)becker44a Wrote: The 3rd screenshot is Autoset For Her mode. In this case the reported mode is accurate. Actually, the 3rd screenshot on June 4th is another AutoSet date. The mode is shown correctly as "AutoSet for Her" on June 18th. These dates agree with the dates on the Statistics page. The SD card you uploaded covers a different period than what you are posting here (93 days vs 129 days). I do see problems with the 95% leak rate and 95% pressure numbers on the Statistics page and will investigate. RE: OSCAR Statistics Page - becker44a - 09-07-2020 Hi Guy, If you were requesting my Overview screenshot, here it is: [attachment=26340] Since the 1st of July, I have been running Autoset/Soft response mode. Resmed may not have classed the response settings as separate modes, but it certainly affects the pressure adjusting algorithm, and my body likes Soft response better than the other modes, as is fairly evident from the Overview pressure graph. RE: OSCAR Statistics Page - GuyScharf - 09-07-2020 I know what you mean -- I prefer the soft response mode on the AutoSet too. RE: OSCAR Statistics Page - GuyScharf - 09-07-2020 I think this will be a simple fix, but I need to do a careful code review and testing to confirm. (The 95th percentile calculation was using "break" when it should have used "continue" -- which didn't matter for a single day but did for a range of days. Plus some minor twiddles to reverse the logic of knowing a good range vs a bad. Old code would always return 0 if there was a single day with summary data only in the range.) Does this look about right to you? [attachment=26344] RE: OSCAR Statistics Page - becker44a - 09-08-2020 Hi Guy, Yeah, those values look pretty reasonable. Thanks, |