[News] RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - Printable Version +- Apnea Board Forum - CPAP | Sleep Apnea (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums) +-- Forum: Public Area (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums/Forum-Public-Area) +--- Forum: Main Apnea Board Forum (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums/Forum-Main-Apnea-Board-Forum) +--- Thread: [News] RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS (/Thread-News-RECALL-THREAD-IMPORTANT-PHILIPS-DREAMSTATION-SYSTEM-ONE-USERS) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
|
RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - btreger - 04-12-2022 Pacific Daily News Guam included in CPAP respirator recall: Guam residents are included in the voluntary recall of CPAP and BiPAP respirator products, according to a news release from the Office of the Attorney General. Philips Respironics, the company that produced the devices, recently sent a letter to Attorney General Leevin T. Camacho and attorneys general from other territories informing them about the recall plan. Guam included in CPAP respirator recall | Money | guampdn.com RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - NotADr - 04-12-2022 (04-10-2022, 03:21 PM)Laslo Wrote: I had two Phillips CPAPS that needed to be replaced. I got the Dreamstation 1 replaced with the Dreamstation 2, but they still have not replaced my Dreamstation GO. Very annoying. My Dreamstation GO also awaits their attention. My guess is that in their scheme of prioritizing repairs, machines marketed for travel purposes are at the bottom of the list because they have concluded that those buyers have another machine that they are able to use in the meantime. Media News Update - WakeUpTime - 04-15-2022 "Philips Respironics CPAP Recall Leaves Many Patients With Difficult Choice" CBS News Boston | April 8, 2022 Quote:Philips Respironics does not own or manage the CPAP patient’s contact information – many patients purchase their devices through third parties. Philips Respironics is working with those third parties (Durable Medical Equipment providers – DMEs) to also reach patients directly as quickly as possible. We are working around the clock to continue to reach out to our customers and patients. https://boston.cbslocal.com/2022/04/08/philips-respironics-cpap-machine-recall-fda-report-i-team-wbz-tv/ Additional Media Updates - ApneaBoard Referenced - WakeUpTime - 04-15-2022 "Alabama Man Believes His Philips CPAP Machine Caused Bladder Cancer" Quote:The first of the two lawsuits was filed on February 17, 2022, by an Alabama man who says he purchased his Philips’ System One CPAP machine in 2011 for the treatment of his sleep apnea. This is one of the machines included in Philips’ recall. He used it every night for about nine years. Then in 2020, he experienced bleeding while urinating. Several weeks later, he was diagnosed with bladder cancer and forced to undergo surgery to remove his bladder. "Four Plaintiffs Sue Philips for Failing to Warn Consumers Earlier" Quote:The plaintiffs argue that Philips knew about the potential risks from its devices related to the degradation of the PE-PUR foam well before notifying the public on June 14, 2021. Consumers complained about black particles in Philips’ devices several years before that, as evidenced by forum posts and statements on internet message boards frequented by obstructive sleep apnea patients. https://newyork.legalexaminer.com/health/plaintiffs-file-two-new-lawsuits-claiming-philips-failed-to-warn-about-cpap-dangers/ RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - btreger - 04-15-2022 The Guardian Thousands of ventilators were pulled as electrical faults put UK patients’ lives at risk Two thousand ventilators being used in UK hospitals are at risk of suddenly shutting down due to electrical faults that have led to a global safety alert. Hospitals have been ordered to source replacement ventilators after Philips Respironics said its breathing support devices could suddenly stop working, in some cases without activating a warning alarm. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said the problem related to “a number of electrical faults in the devices, which can result in an unexpected shutdown, leading to loss of ventilation”. Thousands of ventilators pulled as electrical faults put UK patients’ lives at risk | Hospitals | The Guardian RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - pholynyk - 04-15-2022 Buried in that article is the following: >>> The latest safety alert relates to V60, V60 Plus and V680 Philips ventilators and affects about 105,000 devices globally, and 2,000 in the UK, Philips said. So I think these are not home-use ventilators. In addition, the incidence is fairly low: >>>It said there had been five reported cases of shutdowns in the UK so far, none of which involved patient harm. Globally, there have been 389 reports of failures, including one where the patient died and four where they were seriously injured. In six of the total cases, the warning alarm didn’t sound. So low probability, but high consequence... RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - btreger - 04-18-2022 Philips E-Mail Like most of you, I received a new e-mail from Philips this morning. Nothing new so I will not post the whole thing. Just the last sentence just shows how stupid Philips thinks we all are, and how out of touch they are with reality. "Thank you for your continued patience and trust" RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - btreger - 04-18-2022 Regarding the e-mail sent by Tom Wilson to Dr.Jeff Shuren of the FDA Posted 04/07 This is his response: Dear Mr. Wilson, I appreciate you and your fellow patients reaching out to me. I empathize with what people have experienced with the recall. We have been engaging with Philips continually to emphasize that they need to manufacture devices that do not have these problems, fix currently available devices in the interim, and provide patients and providers with the information they need. Our recent legal action ordering the company to provide notification to patients about the recall and the risks of the recalled devices reflects our own frustration with Philips’ activities to date and our efforts to use the tools available to us. We have raised and continue to press on several of the issues and suggestions you raise and will continue to do so. I appreciate, as well, the desire to have a new, rather than a refurbished device. Given the current state of the manufacturers of these products, there will not be a sufficient number of new devices available in the short term; refurbished devices are the short-term alternative. Some of this is the result of worldwide component shortages about which we have been working with other parts of the US government. Unless you have concerns, I will share your email with the CEO of Philips, to help him appreciate the breadth and depth of patient concerns. Regards Jeff RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - TimaaaaaaaahRocks - 04-18-2022 (04-15-2022, 02:45 PM)pholynyk Wrote: So low probability, but high consequence... Yessir. Any failure with "Low probability but with high consequence" should be red flagged by a properly performed risk analysis and never marketed. This isn't just a 'hey the glue dried out and nobody noticed' problem. Just another shoddy design that apparently did not go through proper safety analysis and testing. Failure Mode: Adhesive does not hold the capacitor bracket in place. (adhesive? for real? just a fancy name for glue. they used glue to mount a critical component! I reckon bailing wire, chewing gum, or duct tape were all too expensive.) Effect: Serious adverse health consequences and death. "If the adhesive fails, it could cause a capacitor support bracket to become loose and potentially damage the capacitors, which could cause the ventilator to stop providing ventilation to the patient. This failure may cause an alarm to notify the health care provider, or it may not sound any alarm at all," the agency wrote. The effect of the cessation of ventilation on the patient will depend on whether an alarm sounds. In the worst-case scenario, the lack of an alarm could leave the patient deprived of oxygen for "an extended time," FDA said, potentially leading to serious adverse health consequences and death. Philips - WakeUpTime - 04-19-2022 (04-18-2022, 09:18 AM)btreger Wrote: Philips E-Mail Every time Philips uses that statement, it invokes frustration and anger. Getting out in front of bad news and one's deliberate faults by claiming the exact opposite of common belief is indeed a popular tactic used by authoritarian leaders and criminals. Is anyone being patient, with complete willingness to continue waiting as long as possible while continually using Philips' faulty medically-necessary products? Very few. End-users are waiting, and continuing to use their faulty devices, because they medically and/or economically have no choice but to wait. Trust? It's becoming so common today to get ahead of something bad by insisting the exact opposite. It promotes the opposite of "trust". For a company that has already been shown to have deliberately delayed announcing and withholding an immediate "fix" to a known harmful design flaw (short-term or long-term, serious or minor), is at-best disrespectful - and at worst, criminal. Furthermore, merely beginning a recall compaign is not the same as completely solving a problem. There are many issues to be delt with (time, costs, damages, reimbursements, corporate neglect, etc.) The other tactic of course, in continuing to claim the opposite of a bad deed, is the continued insistence that there isn't (yet) 100% credible evidence to suggest otherwise. There are many modern day examples. In essence, very little would be investigated, or invented, if one were required to have pre-existing 100% evidencial proof in all facts to support an definite outcome. Thank goodness that much can be accomplished after the existence of a significant number of clues and related evidence. Perhaps the Philips Public Relations Department had no other means to end their correspondence with end-users. It would be unacceptable to end their e-mails with... Best regards, The Company that Has Knowingly Deceived End-Users By Continuing to Produce Defective Carcinogenic Products to Continually Enhance Its Profitability and Stock Price |