[News] RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - Printable Version +- Apnea Board Forum - CPAP | Sleep Apnea (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums) +-- Forum: Public Area (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums/Forum-Public-Area) +--- Forum: Main Apnea Board Forum (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums/Forum-Main-Apnea-Board-Forum) +--- Thread: [News] RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS (/Thread-News-RECALL-THREAD-IMPORTANT-PHILIPS-DREAMSTATION-SYSTEM-ONE-USERS) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
|
RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - btreger - 12-17-2022 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: PHILIPS RECALLED CPAP, BI-LEVEL PAP, AND MECHANICAL VENTILATOR PRODUCTS LITIGATION, This Document Relates to All Action Master Docket: Misc. No. 21-1230 MDL No. 3014 AMENDED INTERIM PRESERVATION ORDER (APPLICABLE TO TRILOGY DEVICES) WHEREAS, Philips RS has submitted to the FDA a proposal for rework and remediation of Trilogy Devices, as defined below, under which Trilogy Device users will have the PE-PUR foam, and if necessary the airpath components, of the Trilogy Devices, removed and replaced, and the user’s same Trilogy Device will then be returned to the user, and the FDA has allowed rework and remediation activities to proceed; and WHEREAS, Philips’ RS represents that new Trilogy Devices are not being manufactured, and the number of available Trilogy Devices makes it infeasible for Philips RS to preserve whole Trilogy Devices without interfering with the FDA-allowed rework and remediation plan or to allow Trilogy Device users to preserve their own Trilogy Device and also receive a replacement Trilogy Device. 3014_Amended_Interim_Preservation_Order.pdf (uscourts.gov) RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - btreger - 12-21-2022 Reuters Philips says tests on recalled products show limited health risks AMSTERDAM, Dec 21 (Reuters) - Dutch health technology company Philips (PHG.AS) said on Wednesday independent tests on its respiratory devices involved in a major global recall had shown limited health risks. Philips said the latest tests indicated that exposure to particulate matter emissions from degraded foam in DreamStation devices was "unlikely to result in an appreciable harm to health in patients", provided the machines had not been treated with ozone-based cleansing products. Philips says tests on recalled products show limited health risks | Reuters More info on this can be found at FIERCE Biotech https://www.fiercebiotech.com/medtech/philips-testing-finds-minimal-risk-patient-harm-some-recalled-cpap-and-bipap-machines RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - btreger - 12-23-2022 FDA Certain Reworked Philips Respironics Trilogy 100/200 Ventilators Recalled Due to Potential for Silicone Foam Adhesion Failure and Residual PE‐PUR Foam Debris: FDA Safety Communication Date Issued: December 22, 2022 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing additional information to patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers about two recent issues in certain reworked Philips Respironics (Philips) Trilogy 100 and Trilogy 200 ventilators. These Philips Trilogy 100 and Trilogy 200 ventilators were recalled in June 2021 for issues with the polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) sound abatement foam breakdown. The two recent issues are: The silicone sound abatement foam, installed to replace the PE-PUR foam, may separate from the plastic backing due to adhesive failure. The silicone foam material may potentially move and block the airpath, which may reduce airflow in the ventilator and could also cause the device to alarm. If an alarm is not recognized or acted upon, the patient could experience trouble breathing, such as asphyxia, hypoventilation, or hypoxemia, which can be life-threatening. BiPAP and CPAP machines reworked or replaced due to the recall in June 2021 are not affected by this silicone foam adhesion failure. The adhesive is not used to hold the silicone foam in place in the reworked or replaced BiPAP and CPAP machines. Additionally, Philips observed residual PE‐PUR sound abatement foam in some reworked Trilogy 100 and Trilogy 200 ventilators that were returned to customers. Further exposure to PE-PUR foam may cause potential health risks, which can result in serious injury, cause permanent impairment, and require medical intervention to prevent permanent injury to users. Preliminary results show PE-PUR and environmental debris in some samples. Certain Reworked Philips Respironics Trilogy 100/200 Ventilators Recalled Due to Potential for Silicone Foam Adhesion Failure and Residual PE‐PUR Foam Debris: FDA Safety Communication | FDA RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - ST Dog - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 10:08 AM)btreger Wrote: The silicone sound abatement foam, installed to replace the PE-PUR foam, may separate from the plastic backing due to adhesive failure. did they have problems with the foam adhesive on these machines previously? I realize adhesives that are safe to use in the airpath are difficult to find/develop, but I am surprised to see this again. RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - JJJ - 12-23-2022 I received my replacement DS1 BiPAP as couple months ago (reported in this thread), and the replacement was in a double box, where the inner box was to be used for returning the old one, with an included free shipping label. My reaction was 'when hell freezes over,' and the old one resides on a shelf in a closet, where it's going to stay. Today I got the following e-mail from Phillips: Code: From: Philips <globalintake-noreply@sedgwick.com> They have no way to enforce their request, so I will ignore it. . RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - SuperSleeper - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 05:16 PM)JJJ Wrote: They have no way to enforce their request, so I will ignore it. As will I, if and when my machine is ever replaced. Basically, returning the machine will reduce THEIR remediation costs, plus it will cause yet another patient to get a refurbished DS1 instead of a brand new DS2. Returning the machine has no benefit to ANY patient. All the benefit goes to Philips. Seeing as they knew about this whole issue and chose not to do anything about it for months and months, I don't feel as though we owe them anything. Therefore... I will not comply. RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - StratCat48 - 12-23-2022 JJJ..... "I received my replacement DS1 BiPAP as couple months ago (reported in this thread), and the replacement was in a double box, where the inner box was to be used for returning the old one, with an included free shipping label. My reaction was 'when hell freezes over,' and the old one resides on a shelf in a closet, where it's going to stay. They have no way to enforce their request, so I will ignore it." While I totally get where you're coming from (P*ssed at Philips) and I was going to keep my recalled DS1 originally as well, there are folks out there that can not afford to buy a replacement CPAP out of pocket. Holding onto one that serves no purpose to you other than take up closet space only lengthens the time for someone to receive their replacement and continue therapy. I as well was pretty PO'd at Philips, but after giving it thought, I didn't want to screw someone else waiting by no fault of theirs that could use a machine and I did finally ship the DS1 back. Somewhere many months ago in this board or the other CPAP board, someone posted about Philips could possibly bill for unreturned machines and this was kinda/sorta a statement buried in the registration process that was agreed to for the replacement. I went back in what I had copied/downloaded during registration and could find nothing. If indeed there was something stating such, Philips could possibly have a leg to stand on if they wanted to and bill for an unreturned machine. Not sure how far it would get if they tried. RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - StratCat48 - 12-23-2022 "SuperSleeper.... Basically, returning the machine will reduce THEIR remediation costs, plus it will cause yet another patient to get a refurbished DS1 instead of a brand new DS2. Returning the machine has no benefit to ANY patient. All the benefit goes to Philips." JJJ's machine is a BiPAP, thus can not get replaced with a DS2. It would only speed up the process for someone to get a DS1 BiPAP even if refurbished. RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - Gideon - 12-23-2022 Supersleeper I believe you have a mistake n your above post. You stated they knew about it for "months and months", I believe that should read years and years. RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - SuperSleeper - 12-23-2022 (12-23-2022, 08:18 PM)Gideon Wrote: You stated they knew about it for "months and months", I believe that should read years and years. Yep, you're right- my mistake. Years and years. Thanks for correcting that. and a big sarcastic THANKS to Philips... sure appreciate what your company does for us. I probably am gonna get lung cancer from the year or so I used my DreamStation machine. Could have even contributed to my current lung issues, but there's no way to prove it, of course. Sure, I'll send your precious machine back to you. Right after you pay for ALL my medical bills and give my wife a large settlement for when I die. Don't mind sending it back at all, in that case. You think I want another patient to get one of these "refurbished" machines? You think anyone should ever trust Philips again? After they tried to cover up what happened? Nope, I'm not going to be responsible for them sending one of their death machines to another patient. And I'm only half kidding about all that. Well, actually not so much. |