[News] RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - Printable Version +- Apnea Board Forum - CPAP | Sleep Apnea (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums) +-- Forum: Public Area (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums/Forum-Public-Area) +--- Forum: Main Apnea Board Forum (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums/Forum-Main-Apnea-Board-Forum) +--- Thread: [News] RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS (/Thread-News-RECALL-THREAD-IMPORTANT-PHILIPS-DREAMSTATION-SYSTEM-ONE-USERS) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
|
RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - Tampa Jim - 11-29-2023 We're both eligible for new units. Off to the MD for our DME Rx. Done, done and done. RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - Homerec130 - 11-30-2023 We got the notice from them the are having problems reaching out to our doctor to get a script so they can send a replacement unit. Got a call from the doc and she told us she told them she was not prescribing Phillips products for any of her patients. RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - Rich66 - 11-30-2023 I use an ASV machine. My original issued machine was a PR System One 60 series machine that was outdated from when I first got it -- typical terrible DME service taking advantage of a newbie. I signed up for the recall the minute it was posted. Luckily, I had switched to a Resmed before the recall. It has been a couple of years since then. I received notices from them that they considered my machine was past its useful life and that I could get $50 if I wish. I never responded back on those offers. Just a month ago, I received a Dreamstation One delivered to my house -- with everything I need but a modem. Phillips won't give me a modem, the DME won't give me a modem -- they point the finger at each other. The machine appears in good shape with no hours on it. And it is an ASV. RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - Labromaniac - 11-30-2023 I have the exact same situation as you. I just got the same deal in a big box as well. I wish I had taken the $50. I have already given the refurbished Dream Station One machine away and have been happily using the Resmed ASV ever since the recall and my results have been vastly superior to when I was using the Phillips System One ASV. Alas. I am using the included free mailing label to return my very old System One ASV which has been gathering dust on my closet shelf and thus THEY can dispose of it in their landfill and at their cost. Sad situation all these years eh? RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - TimaaaaaaaahRocks - 12-04-2023 (11-29-2023, 03:10 PM)BoxcarPete Wrote: Looks like somebody found a source for lower-cost turbine bearings. Enjoy your promotion while it lasts, buddy!
The FDA warning sounds like an advertisement for the HAPPY FUN BALL! Warning: Pregnant women, the elderly, and children under 10 should avoid prolonged exposure to Happy Fun Ball. Caution: Happy Fun Ball may suddenly accelerate to dangerous speeds.
RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - ST Dog - 12-04-2023 (12-04-2023, 12:23 PM)TimaaaaaaaahRocks Wrote: I've never seen an IP rating for a CPAP machine. Go look at the actual reports that they based that notice on. It's all garbage. Run the humidifier dry and it will smell like burning plastic. That true of my PRS1, my DS1, and my AS10. Spilling water around the humidifier chamber has always been an issue. I have yet to see a picture or video of the supposed problems. You'd except there to at least be photos somewhere of burnt devices. RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - TimaaaaaaaahRocks - 12-04-2023 (12-04-2023, 01:18 PM)ST Dog Wrote: I've never seen an IP rating for a CPAP machine. The User Manual for my AirSense 10 has the IP rating listed in the Technical Specifications section. Every regulated medical device has an inherent IP rating determined by the product's properties and usage environment. How does one perform a biocompatibility analysis on burning plastic emissions? They all may smell like burning garbage if you run 'em dry. However, respironics made the Executive decision to flip off the FDA for years, hence FDA may be more inclined to do their damn jobs for a change and take any and all complaints against respironics garbage seriously. RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - BoxcarPete - 12-04-2023 (12-04-2023, 12:23 PM)TimaaaaaaaahRocks Wrote: I said that because the FDA bulletin mentions that there were 30 occurrences of complaints related to overheating over a period of two years, which has increased to 270 events over a period of three months. That has me wondering if they suddenly replaced a component with a lesser substitute so they could avoid a manufacturer's price increase, shortages due to supplier problems, or they simply found a lower cost product somewhere else that they tossed in there mid-production. RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - btreger - 12-07-2023 PROPUBLICA Millions of People Used Tainted Breathing Machines. The FDA Failed to Use Its Power to Protect Them. The FDA’s complaint-tracking system for medical devices allowed Philips to obscure when it knew about dangerous CPAPs. New reporting shows that regulatory lapses extend to many devices and companies. The FDA maintains that it acted as soon as it learned of the safety concerns in April 2021, just weeks before Philips launched one of the largest recalls of its kind. But a ProPublica and Pittsburgh Post-Gazette investigation found that in the years leading to the recall, the FDA repeatedly failed one of its most critical missions: alerting the public about devices that can inflict serious harm. Over a decade, the agency missed a pattern of warnings from healthcare workers, patients, and others that something was wrong with the company’s popular sleep apnea devices and ventilators. From 2011 to 2021, Philips sent hundreds of complaints about the machines to the FDA, none of which resulted in alerts to doctors or patients. One report described a “black powder substance” inside a ventilator. Another noted foam that was “loose and tangled.” Scores specifically cited “contamination,” a red flag that experts say should have prompted an immediate inquiry because the machines send air directly into the noses and mouths of users, including infants and the elderly. It is unclear who, if anyone, read the reports at the agency. How the FDA Failed to Protect Millions of People From Tainted Breathing Machines — ProPublica RE: RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - aergun - 12-07-2023 I'm sorry if this is not the place for this subject.I decided not to return my Philips ASV and decided to keep it as a spare machine.However, when I opened the machine and cleaned it, I saw that the foam was extremely deteriorated.Can you suggest me a material that I can use instead of this foam? A few solutions written here did not make sense to me. |