[News] RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS - Printable Version +- Apnea Board Forum - CPAP | Sleep Apnea (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums) +-- Forum: Public Area (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums/Forum-Public-Area) +--- Forum: Main Apnea Board Forum (https://www.apneaboard.com/forums/Forum-Main-Apnea-Board-Forum) +--- Thread: [News] RECALL THREAD-- IMPORTANT PHILIPS DREAMSTATION & SYSTEM ONE USERS (/Thread-News-RECALL-THREAD-IMPORTANT-PHILIPS-DREAMSTATION-SYSTEM-ONE-USERS) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
|
RE: Recall of Philips CPAPs - racprops - 06-15-2021 (06-15-2021, 07:57 AM)brianc18t Wrote:(06-15-2021, 01:22 AM)racprops Wrote: Well I may be fooling my self but it seemed like my Dreamstation BiPap was losing pressure.Good info but I am not sure duct tape is the ideal material to use in your machine. I agree, but it is only a tiny bit sealing small separation cracks where I cut the plastic, and we know the foam is bad...it was that or no machine. Rich RE: Recall of Philips CPAPs - brianc18t - 06-15-2021 If you are concerned, a better fix might be JB Weld. It is supposed to be non toxic and food safe. The 5 minute set stuff would probably be plenty strong. You might just want to scuff the plastic up a little with sandpaper first to help it get good adhesion. RE: Recall of Philips CPAPs - racprops - 06-15-2021 (06-15-2021, 08:47 AM)brianc18t Wrote: If you are concerned, a better fix might be JB Weld. It is supposed to be non toxic and food safe. The 5 minute set stuff would probably be plenty strong. You might just want to scuff the plastic up a little with sandpaper first to help it get good adhesion. Thanks that is a good idea. I am also concerned that the foam helps control the air flow as the BiPap seems not as good as before. Curses on Phillips. Rich RE: Recall of Philips CPAPs - GrumpyHere - 06-15-2021 (06-15-2021, 07:54 AM)SleepyHenry Wrote: I looked at connecting the filter at the other end...between tne mask and the tube but it does not seem to fit? Make sure the swivel connector is on the mask. Lots of time it comes off the mask and is stuck on the hose. https://youtu.be/_JT0Q7OsXW4 RE: IMPORTANT NOTICE PHILIPS DREAMSTATION USERS - SarcasticDave94 - 06-15-2021 The big hole in that argument is no other PAP brand is doing massive "recalls" like Respironics is for their foam issues. RE: IMPORTANT NOTICE PHILIPS DREAMSTATION USERS - cathyf - 06-15-2021 (06-15-2021, 05:36 AM)racprops Wrote: It also seems some if not all problems maybe caused by those silly systems cleaners so we may need to sue THEM... My husband and I have a running joke when the William Shatner commercials come on late-night TV -- he says "would Captain Kirk steer you wrong?!?" Yesterday I got to say "Captain Kirk is trying to kill us!!!" RE: IMPORTANT NOTICE PHILIPS DREAMSTATION USERS - Elgeeone - 06-15-2021 FYI, the Tampa VA issues Respironics/Phillips machines solely. The Orlando and Charleston SC VA issues Resmed. Tampa took my veteran husband’s auto bilevel when we moved into their locality. He has a Dreamstation 1 now. After many attempts to get a response so he could swap his for a VAuto, I finally got a call. This is what I was told: “The VA sees this as a voluntary recall, the doctors feel that all their Respironics patients should continue to use their machines as that outweighs the dangers of foam particles and outgassing” They do not intend to replace machines as of this time. They also refused to write an rx so we could purchase online. We were fortunate as one of your suppliers does not require an rx and the Vauto has a significant discount right now which is rare. It will be here tomorrow. Would be interested in hearing other VA pap users experiences. RE: IMPORTANT NOTICE PHILIPS DREAMSTATION USERS - SarcasticDave94 - 06-15-2021 I'm not surprised on VA poor treatment. Some VA centers are terrible. Glad you went out on your own and got a ResMed. RE: Recall of Philips CPAPs - jtech1 - 06-15-2021 The Philips web site says: "We cannot stress enough that Philips is treating this matter with the highest possible seriousness" And under "What to do" for Patients registration for recall: "Please check back soon as we will be adding this functionality within the next few weeks." They should have already had this ready at the time of the recall announcement... and clear info on what they are going to offer... if anything. So now us Philips users all sit around for "weeks" waiting to see what will happen, or go spend $ out of our own pockets to stay treated. RE: Latest on Philips Respironics recall of DreamStation - sawinglogz - 06-15-2021 (06-14-2021, 06:18 AM)SleepyHenry Wrote: This statement bothers me. It seem PR is giving some of us a choice: Continue using your Dreamstation or stop using it. If you can not afford or can not get an alternative device...then decide if the risk of cancer from the broken foam is less than the cardiovascular-Respiratory and Neurodegenerative complications that one can get from sleep apnea? Uhmm...hope that I am reading this incorrectly? It's simply liability shifting. They can say, from this point on, that they advised patients not to use the device. If your doctor says to continue using it, they would argue that any harm that befalls you thereafter is the doctor's liability, not theirs. And if your insurance won't provide an alternative, then they could additionally argue that any harm is your insurer's liability, and again not theirs. |