Hello Guest, Welcome to Apnea Board !
As a guest, you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use.
To post a message, you must create a free account using a valid email address.

or Create an Account


New Posts   Today's Posts

Help with making sense of the data
#21
RE: Help with making sense of the data
Hi Mike,

I'm still fairly new to using PAP therapy (not quite three months yet). I just wanted to respond to a couple of things you said in your original post.

I've had a diagnosis of depression and also anxiety for quite a few years. I've already found in my relatively short time of CPAP usage that my mood is MUCH more stable. My depression and anxiety aren't entirely gone, but it feels great for my mood to be much more reliable.

When you said that you were glad to be diagnosed with sleep apnea, I could totally relate. Even though I was not at all happy about the idea of needing to use a CPAP machine, at the same time it's a relief to know that I have something that has an effective method of treatment and that provides data so I can see how well it's working.

Welcome to this forum. It's a great place for support and suggestions from knowledgeable people.

Post Reply Post Reply
#22
RE: Help with making sense of the data
mikenz,

I know that a lot of the replies have indicated that you need to rather significantly increase the min pressure and maximum pressure, with sbd even saying to increase it all the way to 9-14cm. I beg to differ with the idea that you need to significantly increase your minimum pressure and maximum pressures.

Here's why I would be very cautious about increasing your minimum
(04-13-2016, 03:57 PM)mikenz Wrote: During first month trial I was on 5-11.
The sleep specialist set my machine to 5-12.

i was getting uncomfortable wind in stomach, so adjusted down, helped a little bit with wind, but probably not sleep. rather have wind and sleep well than the other way around.
The air (wind) in your stomach is called aerophagia. And it's a pretty common problem. It's also a problem that can aggravated by increased pressure. If it's bad enough it can interfere with your ability to get to sleep and to stay asleep with the mask on your nose. And unfortunately general restlessness (caused by whatever reason) can increase the aerophagia.

I bring this up because in my humble opinion, raising the minimum pressure from 5 to 9 cm in a person who is already reporting problems with aerophagia can easily make the aerophagia problem get much, much worse. Likewise, increasing your max pressure will allow the machine to increase the pressure to levels where your stomach goes from "uncomfortable" to "unbearable"---as in you might just find yourself waking up feeling like you've swallowed a basketball or bowling ball.

As a side note, my own extremely difficult adjustment period was set off by an initial script for straight CPAP at 9cm with a doc who was unwilling to lower the pressure for the first two weeks. The aerophagia was extreme and it lead to a nasty, long term case of CPAP-induced insomnia, which took 6-12 months to bring under control.

In looking at your data, what I notice is this:

1) Half your treated AHI is made up of CAs. And CAs are not treated by increasing the pressure. And pressure increases can make CAs worse under some circumstances. It's not uncommon for new PAPers to develop a bit of a problem with CAs right after starting PAP therapy. The usual thing sleep docs do with a CAI like yours, however, is to do some prudent watchful waiting: In most people who develop CAs after starting PAP, the CAs disappear by themselves after a few weeks. The hypothesis seems to be that it can take the body a few weeks to fully adjust to PAP therapy and one of the adjustments the body has to do is learning how to properly maintain the CO2 level in the presence of the pressurized air. As others have pointed out, the CO2 level is what provides the trigger for inhalations. But CAs can also be (mis)scored by the machine if you are in a very light sleep bouncing back and forth between real sleep and wake. The reason is that the control of breathing is handed off between the voluntary nervous system (wake breathing) and the autonomous nervous system (sleep breathing) when transitioning to sleep, and part of that handoff includes resetting the CO2 trigger level. In the lab this kind of breathing pause is NOT scored as a CA if it occurs when the EEG says you are awake. So an important question to consider when looking at the CAs scored by your machine is: How restless were you during the times they're being scored? If you were awake or mostly awake anyway, there is a pretty good chance they're not real.

At this point I'd recommend reporting the CAs to your sleep doc's office. If they're not yet worried about them, I'd be inclined to continue monitoring them without worrying too much about them yet.


2) There are NO dense clusters of repeated OAs and Hs in the one night's data you posted. Yes, there are a fair number of obstructive events, but for the most part they're well separated in time--as in they happen with at least 2 minutes between them. That means that for the most part the pressure increases are not being triggered by OAs and Hs. Rather, the pressure increases are most likely being triggered by snoring or flow limitations. You didn't post those graphs, but they're far more useful than the AHI graph that you did post.

So another good question to be asking yourself is whether there's a lot of snoring going on or whether the pressure increases are mainly being caused by activity in the flow limitation graph.

If there's real evidence of snoring going on, then a modest 1 or 1.5 increase in the minimum pressure may be enough to take care of most of it. (Personally, I'd leave the max pressure where it is given that you're fighting aerophagia.)

If there's a lot of activity in the flow limitation graph, you're going to need to tease out how "real" the flow limitations are and whether they respond to pressure increases. Not all things that result in the machine scoring a flow limitation are real flow limitations, and not all of them are fixed by more pressure. In my own case, I have to cap my max pressure and tolerate some flow limitations due to the aerophagia. Doing that allows me to actually sleep with machine, and the ability to sleep (as opposed to dozing lightly most of the night) is critical in feeling well the next day.

You also write:
Quote:I did have a good patch of 4-5 over a few days a week or so ago, but for the last week its been alternating between high 6s and 8s, been tired and grumpy and frustrated at not understanding why etc etc.
Some questions for you to consider:

1) Do you look at the data as soon as you get up in the morning? And if so, do you react badly to seeing an AHI that's in the high 6s or above? There is such a thing as letting the data control how you feel, and you don't want to do that. It may be better to look at the data at night or every couple of days instead of the first thing morning.

2) Have you considered tracking a couple of other potentially significant variables in terms of how you feel? In particular, I'd suggest tracking the discomfort caused by the aerophagia and whether your sleep feels relatively uninterrupted by lots of wakes and restlessness. I suspect that one or both of these things may be more responsible for how you feel in the morning than just the fact that on some days the AHI is elevated due to CAs. In other words, I think you need to be asking yourself these questions:
  • Is the aerophagia (wind in your stomach) worse on the nights where you feel bad the next day?
  • Do you spend a lot more time tossing and turning and being awake in bed on the nights where you feel bad the next day?
If either of these are true, then the problem could be the aerophagia, and addressing the aerophagia may wind up being the solution.

To make it a bit clearer about what I'm suggesting as the root problem:

On a night where aerophagia is a problem, you may have a lot more restlessness and a lot more middle of the night wakes that may only last a minute or two (so you might not remember them all). The initial aerophagia drives the wakefulness and the wakefulness and mini-arousals caused by the aeorphagia causes you to swallow more air, which in turn, increases the aerophagia. Which leads to more restlessness and more aerophagia. (You can get trapped in a nasty feedback loop.) Because you're doing more dozing than usual, the machine winds up (mis)scoring a lot more sleep transition "central apneas" as CAs, and hence when you wake up in the morning and look at the data, the first thing that your brain notices is AHI > 6.5. And so you (quite naturally) associate the feeling bad the next day with the high AHI and not the fact that you were dealing with a bad night's sleep caused by the aerophagia in the first place.


Questions about SleepyHead?  
See my Guide to SleepyHead
Post Reply Post Reply
#23
RE: Help with making sense of the data
(04-14-2016, 09:20 AM)robysue Wrote: I know that a lot of the replies have indicated that you need to rather significantly increase the min pressure and maximum pressure, with sbd even saying to increase it all the way to 9-14cm.

Thank you, robysue, for straightening this out. I appreciate the breadth and depth of your knowledge. It shows me that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing and that I'm not really qualified to make an informed and safe recommendation. There's just no other way to say it. I don't think you are singling me out. I think you're trying help and protect Mike. I applaud that. (Sorry for all of the "I's", I'm just a down-to-earth guy.)

I think I'll stick to addressing electronics topics.

I'm trying to pass a kidney stone and I'm hurting.





Just my personal opinion.  My posts are not medical advice or a statement of fact.  Please consult a qualified physician or other qualified medical personnel.  Please comply with all applicable laws, codes, regulations, and protocols.
Post Reply Post Reply
#24
RE: Help with making sense of the data
(04-14-2016, 07:35 AM)green wings Wrote: I've had a diagnosis of depression and also anxiety for quite a few years. I've already found in my relatively short time of CPAP usage that my mood is MUCH more stable. My depression and anxiety aren't entirely gone, but it feels great for my mood to be much more reliable.
Welcome to this forum. It's a great place for support and suggestions from knowledgeable people.
Thanks green wings, yes indeed, a great place to be more informed and to not feel alone with the sharing of our experiences with others. My doctor said last week that depression can be a symptom of sleep apnea, so if only I was diagnosed earlier (like 25years ago!), but am still thankful for the experience and I can see how it has helped me help others. Anyway hopeful for my sleep therapy to sort out over time. Thanks for sharing, Mikenz
Post Reply Post Reply
#25
RE: Help with making sense of the data
(04-14-2016, 09:20 AM)robysue Wrote: mikenz,
I bring this up because in my humble opinion, raising the minimum pressure from 5 to 9 cm in a person who is already reporting problems with aerophagia can easily make the aerophagia problem get much, much worse.

Robysue, Thank you so much for your time and effort into looking at my data with a thoughtful and thorough reply, much appreciated.

Without quoting your whole post again -
Yes 'uncomfortable' is where I'd put myself for aerophagia at the moment, I'd prefer it not get worse.

Prudent patient waiting is wise advice.

From today I'm going to take notes about what I remember about how I slept - especially so i can track the CA's - if they are in a period of time of restlessness/wakefulness - and the discomfort cause by aerophagia (the problem with all this is that we are so much more aware of how we sleep that it might prevent sleep, and as you say - the nasty cycle of swallowing more air when awake, which makes it worse etc etc - so need to find a balance).

I will post the extra data graphs when the website allows me too, I'm still limited to 200kb.

Again, thank you for enlightening me about this. (its a steep learning curve!)
mikenz
Post Reply Post Reply
#26
RE: Help with making sense of the data
(04-14-2016, 10:39 AM)sdb7802 Wrote: Thank you, robysue, for straightening this out. I appreciate the breadth and depth of your knowledge. It shows me that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing and that I'm not really qualified to make an informed and safe recommendation. There's just no other way to say it. I don't think you are singling me out. I think you're trying help and protect Mike. I applaud that. (Sorry for all of the "I's", I'm just a down-to-earth guy.)

I think I'll stick to addressing electronics topics.

I'm trying to pass a kidney stone and I'm hurting.

Hey sdb7802, don't feel bad about your post (although I hope you get rid of that kidney stone), having other people's input is what a forum is all about. I appreciate your input, and am grateful for your humility in being willing to be corrected and learn more. If you hadn't posted, you probably wouldn't have learned anything.

Having said this, someone might come along with other helpful advice about what robysue has written. It makes sense to me right now, but someone who has more experience and/or training than robysue might add something or correct something she wrote. (I'm sure robysue is grown up enough to speak for herself if needed.)

I think we all need to take responsibility for ourselves - whether it be providing suggestions or receiving them - and you've demonstrated very well your responsibility sdb - thank you. My responsibility is weighing it all up with the best information I have and applying it at my own risk, and in this way there is no one to blame for my own treatment than myself - and as has been noted elsewhere, even our doctor's advice needs to be received with healthy scepticism, respecting their experience and training in which I/we place a lot of trust (they do indeed hold a responsibility toward us patients), but it doesn't absolve me/us from being more informed about my/our treatment and asking the right questions etc.

By the way - i hope this thread doesn't go off topic because of what i've written here - just wanted to say that i appreciate the time and effort others (including you sdb) are making in helping me interpret my data and making the appropriate adjustments.

mikenz
Post Reply Post Reply
#27
RE: Help with making sense of the data
okay, here are a couple more graphs with more info...
Post Reply Post Reply
#28
RE: Help with making sense of the data
I think you probably need a higher bottom pressure, but with the air swallowing you might be better to wait until it subsides a bit (assuming it does) and then increase the bottom number by at most 1cm at a time, giving yourself a few days or a week to get used to that before going higher.

Your machine is not "flat topping" so your high pressure seems high enough now. Raising the bottom will mean that the machine can respond to obstructive events a bit faster, sort of like giving someone a head start in a race. But you don't want to aggravate your air swallowing, so take your time and listen to your body.
Ed Seedhouse
VA7SDH

Part cow since February 2018.

Trust your mind less and your brain more.


Post Reply Post Reply
#29
RE: Help with making sense of the data
"robysue Wrote:
mikenz,
I bring this up because in my humble opinion, raising the minimum pressure from 5 to 9 cm in a person who is already reporting problems with aerophagia can easily make the aerophagia problem get much, much worse."


True if your keeping the machine at 5 then raise it to 9, but The only time your pressure is at 5cm is when you FIRST turn the machine on. Just because the machine is set at 5 does not mean it will stay at 5 unless you lower the Max Pressure to 5 or where ever you don't want it to go above.

Your Min is 5 BUT YOUR Med is almost 9, your 95% is almost 11, and your Max is almost 12.
Post Reply Post Reply
#30
RE: Help with making sense of the data
(04-14-2016, 04:53 PM)mikenz Wrote: Hey sdb7802, don't feel bad about your post (although I hope you get rid of that kidney stone), having other people's input is what a forum is all about. I appreciate your input, and am grateful for your humility in being willing to be corrected and learn more. If you hadn't posted, you probably wouldn't have learned anything.

Mike,

Thanks for your kind words of encouragement. Robysue knows her stuff and I'm glad she continues to share her considerable wisdom with the forum. I haven't passed my stone but it doesn't hurt much now. Good luck with your treatment.

Steve
Just my personal opinion.  My posts are not medical advice or a statement of fact.  Please consult a qualified physician or other qualified medical personnel.  Please comply with all applicable laws, codes, regulations, and protocols.
Post Reply Post Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  ResMed Air Sense if set to no ramp but EPR ramp only ? new user posting 1 week oscar REMmi 37 1,298 Yesterday, 05:39 PM
Last Post: SarcasticDave94
  Pressure Problem: Can Anyone Make Sense Of This, Please?? channeal 2 218 12-04-2024, 11:07 AM
Last Post: Deborah K.
  [CPAP] Trying to make sense of my OSCAR data (newbie) aardvarkpineapple 1 304 10-15-2024, 07:54 PM
Last Post: G. Szabo
  Larger reservoir for Air Sense 10 Autoset RonKMiller 33 25,635 10-12-2024, 07:07 AM
Last Post: Nosludhe
  [Treatment] Making my own settings Lady Knitsalot 24 1,482 10-11-2024, 12:26 PM
Last Post: Lady Knitsalot
  New Air Sense 11 User schuller007 1 222 09-04-2024, 12:02 AM
Last Post: Crimson Nape
  Do these settings make sense on an ASV and is it even worth trying a BiPAP? erouting 6 365 08-28-2024, 08:46 PM
Last Post: SarcasticDave94


New Posts   Today's Posts


About Apnea Board

Apnea Board is an educational web site designed to empower Sleep Apnea patients.