OSCAR not reporting Total Time in Apnea

[sawinglogz]

Interesting. Since 11/29 is a partial night, I wouldn't put too much weight on its HR change percentage.

Based on the sample size, to my eye, they look roughly equivalent: 6%-14%. You do have two lower nights on the Resmed of 5% and 4%, which could be good, or it could just be random; those aren't that much below 6%. With more nights, you could be more confident of a significant distinction between the two.

The other thing you might look at is why the regression to 14% on 11/27 and 11/28. You only had 14% the very first night on the DreamStation, and then it dropped town to 9% or below.

Glad your ablation seems to have improved things!

[jas102543]

[b]sawinglogz, [/b]Thanks LumberJack, if you're always sawing logs you must have some lumberjacking in your past. In my younger, wilder days I enjoyed mixing it up with those upstate NY, Adirondack mountain rednecks. I swear every 3rd one was missing some fingers. But, I digress. You lead me to take a closer look at the data that's most important to me, the Heart Rate Change % - the lower the better for Atrial Fibrillation. I'm lucky because my Ablation is holding better than I expected and unlike most others with no negative side effects. Thanks Again!