Apparently different labs use different criteria and this is permitted under AASM guidelines.
http://www.aasmnet.org/articles.aspx?id=4203
I was very surprised to learn this, and saw one example on another forum where someone had an AHI of less than 5 under one set of guidelines (used by Medicare) and yet was scored as having moderate OSA according to the recommended AASM guidelines. Quite a difference!
Then, I recently found out that two of the biggest makers of XPAP devices base their determination of an hypopnea on different criteria as well:
"An hypopnea is indicated if there is approximately 40% reduction in airflow for a duration of between 10 and 60 seconds, compared to the average airflow over an extended period of several minutes. Following a reduction in airflow, the therapy device must see two recovery breaths in order to label the event as a potential hypopnea. (Respironics detection is 40% reduction and ResMed detection is 50% reduction)"
So their standards are different and lower than those used the AASM requiring a 30% reduction in airflow to qualify and be scored as an hypopnea.
For those of us who have been diagnosed using the 30% definition if these events are not being reported, are they being adequately treated?
Thanks for any input on this, and i am hoping that I have misunderstood something in all of this that can easily be clarified.
I have to report that CPAP has worked wonders for me so whatever it is doing, it is working in my case, but I am curious about this.